
| Electro(nic) waste today |
Open burning of plastics and other material is common in Guiyu, China in order to reduce the waste to metals.
© Basel Action Network The volumes of “electro(nic)” waste increase steadily. This waste contains approximately 20% plastics, mainly high impact polystyrene (HIPS) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). The addition of flame retardants (mainly brominated organic compounds, which can decompose through thermal treatment - also when being extruded - to highly toxic reaction products) prohibits the classical plastic recycling through a melt process (re-granulation), because it would increase the decomposition reactions. This is why approximately 70% of the electronic waste of Europe and the USA is exported to China, because there "High-Tech" recycling and energy recovery is possible without any regulation from authorities.
In Germany every year approximately 50.000 metric tons plastic waste have to be incinerated at high cost - because they contain only 250 g of toxic reaction products. Since 1993 Europe has addressed this issue by using only brominated flame retardants, which don’t create high dioxane/furane concentrations. Unfortunately this proactive effect is destroyed by electro/electronic imports from Far East, because those still favour and use problematic flame retardants. Plastic waste collectors are not able to distinguish between European and Asian produced material, and therefore these plastics require incineration at increasing cost. Today the shrinking metal content in electronic equipments starts hurting the European recycling industry because non-ferrous heavy metal recycling is their main income and they still lack a technology to cope with the increasing masses of plastics.
The Dilemma Especially here the CreaSolv® Process of the Fraunhofer Institute IVV and the CreaCycle GmbH is the method of choice, because flame retardants and their toxic reaction products remain in the CreaSolv® Formulation. The latter can be isolated and sent to a separate waste-handling. Possible concentrations of remaining flame-retardants or toxic reaction products are far below the permitted limits. If the goal is to behave both in an economically and ecologically responsible manner (incineration = CO2 = “Green House” effect) this is the right direction, because the resulting recycled material has similar mechanical properties with the virgin material.
Contact at Fraunhofer Institut IVV:
Important Guidelines: More information:
|